VICE President Yemi Osinbajo recently added his voice to the on-going debate on the restructuring of the federation. He came out fully in support of state police and fiscal federalism which will put more resources at the disposal of the states, as federating units.  The debate on the desirability or oth­erwise of state police has been on for de­cades. It is part of the larger debate on the re-structuring of the country. The contribu­tion of Osinbajo to the controversial issue is welcome.

Calls for state police have refused to sub­side because of the perceived serial abuse of the Nigeria Police Force under a central Federal authority. The argument is that un­der the present structure, the police force is a behemoth hiding under a central authori­ty that is too far removed from the people to be effective and responsive to their needs.

The Nigeria Police Force is one of the abiding features of our unbalanced federal­ism. But, it has not always been like this. In the colonial and early post-independence eras, Nigeria had different levels of polic­ing, with the Native Authority Police, Re­gional Police and the Federal Police.

Although the different levels of the police under the old order were widely criticised and regarded as political appendages of their appointing authorities, which were perceived to have serially abused them, there is no running away from the advan­tages of bringing the policing function clos­er to the grassroots by removing it from one central authority in a distant capital city.

The argument has been made that the adoption of state police will help to in­crease the total number of policemen in the country, considering the fact that Nigeria is currently under-policed.

The number of policemen in Nigeria today, which is said to be below 400,000, leaves the country with a ratio of one po­liceman to 450 citizens.

The closer the police are to the people, the better. State police will make this possible. Going by our present 36-state structure, it would mean having 36 different centres of authority, working side by side with a fed­eral police which will not need to be as big and unwieldy as we have it now. The fed­eral police, under this arrangement, will mostly concentrate on federal offences, as is the case with, for instance, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the United States of America.

If we consider practices in other coun­tries, we will see that the United Kingdom has 45 territorial police forces and three special police forces, while the US has even more than that spread across hundreds of counties and states. If this arrangement has resulted in effective policing in these places, we should consider the option in Nigeria.

Related News

State police is possible in Nigeria, given that our laws are already structured along state and federal lines. We are not, howev­er, unmindful of the fact that the Nigerian Constitution will have to be amended to ac­commodate this arrangement. Section 214 (1) of the constitution states that “there shall be a Police Force for Nigeria, and subject to the provisions of this section, no other Police Force shall be established for the Federation or any part thereof.”

This provision has to be tinkered with has it outlaws the establishment of any police other than the Nigeria Police Force. That should not be too difficult, as we have a National Assembly which can amend the constitution to pave the way for the estab­lishment of state police.

We recall, too, that the need for state police was a big issue at the 2014 National Conference, with the Confab deciding in its favour. This is one more reason why the recommendations of that conference should be revisited, instead of throwing the baby away with the bath water.

In the end, the call for state police can­not be completely divorced from the calls for the restructuring of the federation. We need to decide on the import issues of fis­cal federalism and devolution of powers.

One of the arguments against state po­lice is the present poor revenue base of most states and whether they can genu­inely fund a police force.

Beyond the allocations to states from the Federation Account, state governors have to change their present beggarly ori­entation towards Abuja if they are to have state police. They will need to aggressively increase their internally generated rev­enue to take on more responsibilities in a restructured Nigeria.

There is also the fear that state police could be subjected to abuse by the vari­ous state authorities. Although this is pos­sible, the same argument can also be made against the present centralized federal po­lice.

What matters is the need to strengthen institutions such as the police and sub­sume the holders of their leadership posi­tions at any time to the laws guiding their operations, as should be the case in a true democracy. Therefore, state police is pos­sible if we have a strong will to make it a reality.